Selected work in enterprise software and solution design
One flagship school ERP engagement, three related engineering case studies, clearly labelled design and concept studies, and a compact grouped record of older NeoSOFT products and client assignments.
Flagship project
Centralized multi-school ERP architecture and engineering leadership.
Client engagement through NeoSOFT
Centralized Multi-School ERP: Architecture and Engineering Leadership
Client engagement through NeoSOFT on a centralized multi-school ERP. My work covered solution architecture, cross-module workflows, production and reliability investigation, reporting decisions, and delivery leadership with the wider team.
Related case studies
Distinct workstreams within the same ERP engagement — performance, reporting, and release governance.
Investigation and remediation planning
Investigating Performance and Reliability in an Enterprise ERP
Within the school ERP engagement, Redis memory growth, PostgreSQL CPU pressure, materialized-view refresh load, query amplification, middleware latency, and connection-pool concerns were investigated. This case separates observation, immediate stabilization, later investigation, proposed follow-up, and measured results where actually available.
Defined delivery practices
Defining Release Governance for Enterprise Engineering Teams
For the school ERP program, contribution focused on making SRS sign-off, walkthroughs, technical-flow ownership, architecture review, QC evidence, PR governance, environment access, release impact/rollback, production checks, and RCA expectations explicit.
Reporting architecture decisions
Designing Reporting Across ERP Workflows
Operational and executive reports needed consistent business definitions, freshness choices, access hierarchy, and refresh ownership — distinguishing live, near-real-time, materialized-view, and nightly-summary paths, and separating existing portal/Metabase reporting from proposed embedded Metabase work.
Solution design and concept studies
Labelled design and concept work. These are not presented as completed production products.
Solution design · Requirements review
Smart Recruiting: A Multi-Role Workflow Design Study
A structured design and requirements review of a recruitment platform spanning candidates, Talent Acquisition, interviewers, HR, employees, and vendors — from manpower requisition through joining handoff.
Solution design
Employee Performance Management: Solution Design
A proposed NestJS and React portal design for goals, KPI cycles, evidence, reviews, and approvals, with Employee Master data supplied through an external integration.
Product concept · Capability mapping
AVIRA One: Factory and Global Supply Capability Map
A six-suite product capability-map concept linking sourcing, plant operations, quality, warehousing, global sales/logistics, and intelligence through shared workflow, master-data, and integration concerns.
Website experience concept
AVIRAFOOD: A B2B Website Experience Concept
A visual and motion direction concept for a global B2B/export website, connecting product ingredients, layers, and global movement into a proposed brand journey.
Enterprise platforms and client assignments
Name-level records from NeoSOFT internal platforms and additional client assignments where detailed project evidence is limited. Technologies, features, scale, and outcomes are not inferred from names alone.
NeoSOFT internal platforms — enterprise operations
Internal product work through NeoSOFT employment. Names are listed without expanded stacks, features, or outcomes.
- Billing — Internal product; detailed personal contribution not expanded here.
- CRM — Internal product; detailed personal contribution not expanded here.
- Client Management — Internal product; detailed personal contribution not expanded here.
- SOP — Internal product name retained; name listed only.
- Survey / Feedback Portal — Internal portal; detailed personal contribution not expanded here.
- CMART — Internal product; name listed only.
- Collab — Internal product; name listed only.
- Scoreboard — Internal product; name listed only.
- Ticket System — Internal product; detailed personal contribution not expanded here.
- Connectoo — Internal product; name listed only.
NeoSOFT internal platforms — people and delivery systems
Internal product work through NeoSOFT employment. Names are listed without expanded stacks, features, or outcomes.
- Task Manager — Internal product; detailed personal contribution not expanded here.
- Employee Management — Internal product; separate from the Performance Management design study.
- Interview App — Internal application; separate from the Smart Recruiting design study.
- Bug Tracker — Internal product; detailed personal contribution not expanded here.
NeoSOFT internal platforms — shared technology services
Internal platform and workstream names through NeoSOFT employment.
- SSO — Single sign-on platform/workstream name; name listed only.
- Data Center Management — Internal platform/workstream name; name listed only.
Additional client assignments through NeoSOFT
Selected client assignments undertaken through NeoSOFT — not independent consulting customers who hired Vipul directly. The centralized multi-school ERP flagship is documented separately under Projects.
- VMX — Client assignment through NeoSOFT; detailed scope not expanded here.
- Myfara — Client assignment through NeoSOFT; public detail limited to the assignment name.
- Ahawaadmin — Client assignment through NeoSOFT; detailed scope not expanded here.
- Choovie — Client assignment through NeoSOFT in the movie-ticket booking domain; name listed only.
- Ebullion — limited support assignment — Limited support assignment through NeoSOFT.
- BOB Bank — Target System — Target System assignment through NeoSOFT.
Deeper reading
- Case studies
Longer architecture and delivery narratives.
- Services
How similar problems can be scoped as engagements.
Working through something similar?
Tell me what you are building or where the system is struggling. We can identify whether an architecture review, ERP blueprint, performance diagnostic, or technical advisory is the right next step.